Total Pageviews

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Rule changes Soccer needs to make


If you pay attention to European soccer, you've undoubtedly noticed the dominance of FC Barcelona this year. Four times, in a period of just over two weeks, they played rival Real Madrid in a display of elite soccer. For the most part, these games were phenomenal. However, for all the positives these games offered, it was a few of the negatives that stuck out the most.

Whining, stalling, complaining, diving, botched calls and poor cards, prompted me to propose a few rule changes FIFA (soccer's governing body) needs to implement to improve the game and increase its' appeal to non-soccer zealots around the world. In addition to a few ideas which have been floating around for a while, I offer several new ideas which, if properly implemented, will improve the flow of games, decrease fan violence, and increase the integrity of the product on the field.

With that in mind, I offer the following 5 suggestions. I realize not all of these suggestions are realistic, but sometimes it's a little more fun to think outside of the box...

1) PENALIZE FLOPPING, DIVING, WHINING, STALLING, ETC.

Not only is it annoying, but it slows the game down, ruins game flow and incites violence in the stands. It's been part of the game for decades, but there is a simple solution to all but eliminate the drama in less than six months. I propose a system of post-game reviews in which players are warned and ultimately penalized for flopping, diving, etc. FIFA would review each game and decide which players consistently tried to manipulate the referee and rules. If a player is guilty, FIFA penalizes him using a point system; accrue enough points and the player builds to a yellow card, red car or suspension. 

Implement the point system and players will quickly adjust their behavior because they won't want to lose time on the field. Do this, and player dramatics will decrease, game flow will improve, as will the viewing experience, and fan violence will decrease. Having attended several European matches, nothing gets fans angrier than an opposing player who fakes an injury. Eliminate faking injuries, and you will decrease the number of violent occurrences in the stands.

2) AWARD POST-MATCH YELLOW AND RED CARDS

FIFA already rescinds cards if a post-match review reveals a card was not warranted. Lets take it a step further and give cards when a call was missed. Refs do a great job, for the most part, but there is a lot of ground to cover, so lets give them some post-match help. 

Like the first suggestion on this list, post-match reviews will force players to be more careful and will immediately improve player behavior. If FIFA begins suspending players and carding them after matches, players would adjust their behavior in less than six months and soccer would become more enjoyable to watch.  
    *MORAL NOTE: Soccer would be a sport of much higher integrity, instead of an example of what we tell our kids NOT to do.

3) GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY

This is the biggest no-brainer in the history of sports. Stadiums are filled with HD cameras at virtually every angle. To not take advantage of modern technology is absurd. Scoring in soccer is more rare than in any other sport, so lets get it right. Getting this going is easy. Hire an official to review every goal scored, as well as any goal that is even close. 

We've all watched games and see the reviews in less than five seconds. When a goal is in question, the referee simply clicks on an ear piece and the review official tells him whether a goal was scored or not. It's quick, easy, and ensures complete accuracy. Problem solved.

4) RED FLAG CHALLENGES

Along the lines of using modern technology, allow coaches to use one red flag a game. Red flags can be used to challenge disputed goals, yellow or red cards, or missed calls by referees such as punches, elbows and hand balls. Again, referees do a good job, but there are 22 players on the field at once and it's hard to keep an eye on all of them in such a large space. 

While awarding post-match cards and suspensions, as mentioned above, will help, getting it right in the game is just as important. Allow coaches to throw the red flag, stop the game, and lets get the calls right, expose dirty and cheating players, and penalize them.

5) CHANGE THE WAY PENALTY KICKS ARE AWARDED

Penalty kicks are converted way too frequently to hand them out for penalties where a player was not in a clear scoring position. For example, a player is near the goal line on the edge of the penalty box, he gets his feet clipped and a penalty is awarded. Was this player going to score? No. He may have been in a good position to cross the ball to a teammate who may have scored, but that is a scenario filled with too much doubt to award a penalty kick which will almost certainly lead to a goal.

I propose a change to a two-type system. Type 1, award a PK from the regular spot on all plays where a player is fouled in a clear goal scoring position. Type 2, award a PK from three yards back for penalties in the box, but when the player was not in a clear goal scoring position. Again, goals are too rare to give a freebies that are not deserved.


Soccer is wildly popular around the world and in no way struggling for fans. However, all successful leagues and sports are constantly looking for areas to improve and ways to bring in new fans. I can't speak for the rest of the world, but these changes would increase viewership in the United States, which would be a huge addition for the sport of soccer.

FIFA has the power to make these changes happen and improve what is already a beautiful game. The question is whether or not they are even open to these types of proposals.

Anybody have FIFA on their speed dial?

33 comments:

  1. stick with NFL please and stay away from football.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ^typical diehard futbol fan stuck in their ways. Everything mentioned here is a problem with the sport. Personally, I find it so annoying to watch the players constantly diving and faking injuries. They look like a bunch of panzies out there doing it. Seems no matter where the contact is made, it ensues rolling around on the ground grabbing an ankle. This faking is even amplified if their team is in the lead and they want to take a few minutes off the clock.

    And, the horrible missed calls should be huge giant red flags that something needs to get changed. 2 horrible calls today alone in the WWC. I mean really.... a defender can catch the ball in her hands and walk with it for a bit and get away with it!? REALLY?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Plz .... shut up and stick with other sports.... you are an idiot....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post. For those people who cannot think for themselves, I come from a country where football is the only sport (no basketball, rugby or other golf). I agree with the suggestions. All the other sports do have cheaters and disadvantages but the technology and common sense is being used to make the game better. Even when watching live, it takes commentators less than 5 seconds to check most calls. It's just commmon sense and left us leave the 'human' aspect of football up to the players on the field only.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Have to also agree. Anyone who disagrees should try to post a valid intelligible reason other than 'shut up'.
    Who wants to watch a match where everyone whines and flops all over the place (with people getting sent off by cheating of others)?
    Who wants to see legitimate goals disallowed over and over?
    Who wants to see cheats (and in some cases criminals who endanger other athletes) go unpunished (even if ref did not see)?
    Someone please give me some good reasons why the suggestions are bad? The time argument is nonsense because as someone said above, the commentators can even check calls in realtime within seconds. If they cared about time so much why not put up a public clock so we can all see how much time is left and wasted?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Some pretty good ideas, and some that are a little too radical to be realistic. But I've long thought that it would be relatively easy and effective to have some sort of post-game review process in major competitions. Award yellow cards, suspensions, and/or fines for obvious dives and fouls caught on camera. I agree that if these offenses were penalized, and the offenders publicly embarrassed, then the games would be cleaned up significantly.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Change all the rules you want...Soccer will still be incredibly boring to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  8. hahaha ok here we go

    1) There are no rules in soccer/futbol, only laws.
    2) The humanity of the calls is what makes the game so much more engaging than having a computer to back everything up. So many more games are more widely talked about due to the controversy of the calls that are made or those that are not.
    3) In the book of laws, a yellow card should be shown to players believed to be attempting to manipulate the ref (I forget if it's its own rule or if it falls under sportsmanship, it's been a few years since I was last tested). Now getting a ref that is strong enough to start passing them out is a completely different story...
    4) I like ideas 2 and 3 but FIFA and it's current chairman are very old fashioned and you're not likely to see any changes in the next few world cups.
    5) I do have to give the other commenters a little credit, a lot of your ideas have sprung from the NFL, and just because it works with the American sport, does not mean it'll be accepted world-wide.
    6) Kicks from the mark are in integral part of the game, I cannot for any reason see the laws applying to them changing in any fashion nearly as dramatic as you have proposed anywhere in the future. I feel as though your dislike of them or how they are handled has a personal bias and would be much harder to govern. I guess I'm trying to say that your 5th suggestion made me chuckle.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I appreciate the comments, both good and bad. I realize not all of these changes are realistic, but it's fun to think outside the box. I'm convinced if the inventors of the game had made the rules with all of this technology and information available, the rules would change for sure. To say "it's the human element", etc, is being shortsighted.
    Football used to play without helmets, the mound in baseball has changed over the years, and my guess is soccer used to only use one ref. Rules will always change as technology and necessity allows it. Change and stay relevant, stay the same and fall behind!

    ReplyDelete
  10. For complaining about flopping and injuries slowing down the game and ruining the flow, how do you justify allowing coaches to stop the game altogether to review a call? I can see coaches abusing that to stop momentum. Also, the PK idea is just dumb. It's still heavily favored towards the taker. Direct scoring chances result in a PK. Other fouls result in indirect from the spot (or the edge of the 6yd box if the foul is in the 6yd box). It's still dangerous enough to try and avoid, but not a death sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  11. To last comment... Your point about stopping momentum is well taken, which is why I would suggest only one challenge per game and it would only be used when your team held possession, thus avoiding coaches trying to stop breakaways, advantage, etc.. If once a game a coach used a challenge, you would stop the game for less than a minute for the challange... (which is why i suggested a review official in the box and an ear piece for the ref to speed it up)

    ReplyDelete
  12. JS
    I still can't envision the flag working. I think it works extremely well in football because of the 6-10 sec. duration of the plays. I just can't imagine it translating to the pitch. I think if you really want to clean up missed calls, use your review/points system for refs. Get too many points, temporary revocation of your reffing license...basically a suspension. Also, refs with the lowest point totals are invited to ref more meaningful matches (i.e. WWC semi or finals). I have a pretty flexible mind, but I just can't get the flag thing going. I do like ideas 1-3, though.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yeah, I realize suggestions 4 and 5 are extreme, which is why i put them last.. Always trying to think ahead of the game a little. I just want to get the calls right and penalize people who flop, whine and play dirty. I'm guessing there is a rating system for refs in place already. Keep trying to wrap your mind around the flag idea. It's like there Matrix; there is no spoon!

    ReplyDelete
  14. 6) Dispense with offsides. No offsides would mean more scoring (probably) and fewer blown calls (obviously).

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1) You already get booked for obvious diving! Do that twice in a game and you will be sent off and be suspended for the next match.

    2) There are post-match reviews! If there is evidence (video footage etc.) that you committed a "sending-off offence" which the referee missed, like elbowing, spitting, offensive language or gestures, you can be suspended for the next matches.

    3+4) In my opinion football does not need more technical aid. Humans aren't perfect, nor is the game. Yes, there missed calls, incorrect given or not given goals, incorrect given or not given offsides, etc. etc.! But these things even out over time. Remember the 1966 Wembley goal? 2010 Germany had its revenge. And don't forget, that a crappy referee adds to the atmosphere of a match. USA vs. Brazil last Sunday wouldn't be such a great game without these questionable referee decisions.
    Actually I would miss the endless debate with my friends on our way back home from the stadium: "Eh, why did that f****** ref called it offside? The forward was 2 meters behind the defender!" or "Thank God, the ref didn't saw that the defender has been pushed before our forward scored!".
    Another point is that the Laws of the Game should apply to every level of football. Yes, in a Champions League final you have cameras all around. But what about a 12th division match played on a dirt field? One of the coaches throw the flag and then ask the audience if somebody recorded the scene with a cell phone? No way!

    5) There are minor offences (e.g. back-pass rule) that don't lead to a penalty, but to an indirect free kick within the box.

    Greetings from Dresden/Germany

    ReplyDelete
  16. Do refs work with the same crew every game or is the does the center have new ARs each match? I think you can get a lot more consistency if you keep the same 4 refs together every match since they can get used to each other and watch out for the areas where the other refs in their crew are weaker, like spotting a dive from a different angle and not being afraid to wave their flag on it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. How about adding a "clock referee" who monitors the match from the press box and assigns stoppage time accurately and precisely based on the actual delays, regardless of whether they are real or fake? (The running tally could even be a graphic flashed on the TV or scoreboard during each delay) Granted, this would increase the average stoppage time, but it would neutralize the delaying effects of flopping, thus discouraging it. FIFA could even assign minimum allowable times for throw-ins, corner kicks, substitutions, etc. after which the stoppage clock would begin running.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I like the suggestion to add a clock referee.. I agree, if more stoppage time was allowed for delays, the players would delay less. I think they might still try to delay to disrupt the game flow though, I like the suggestion though. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The problem is that stoppage time is still subject to the refs opinion, since the board often shows maybe 3 minutes, but the ref allows play for 3 minutes and 24 seconds or something like that. Refs don't end the game when one team has possession and is pushing. They end the game when the ball is in a neutral fashion (on a punt, 50/50 ball in the neutral third) so the game doesn't end precisely on a set number, but relatively close to.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anyone who is "injured" goes to the hospital. After all, they are "injured", right?

    ReplyDelete
  21. They already do 1 and 2. I believe the human element is needed in soccer, and so Goal line technology is not needed. It's not a robotic sport. And number 4 takes away the flow of the game. And in regards to PKs, if a player is in the box, even by a millimeter, and he gets fouled, that is a PK. It is just like in American Football where even if the ball crosses the goal line by a half inch, it is a touchdown, as it should be.

    ReplyDelete
  22. They may already do 1 and 2, but I would like to see them enforce it much much more. The sooner you crack down on it harshly, the sooner it's out of the game and we can enjoy the beautiful game!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hi JS,

    Although #1 is technically on the books, it's rarely called. The diving/flopping really does get ridiculous, too.

    "How are soccer players like vampires? They can go from mortal injury to miraculous recovery in five seconds flat."

    I like ideas #2 and #3.

    Even as a GK, I like the penalty kick rules. I've seen too much inconsistency from referees to trust them to make the correct distinction. It's funny, the original rules actually had no penalty kicks because it was assumed that a gentleman would never foul another person intentionally.

    Also, you had mentioned that there have been some significant rules changes to soccer/football over the years... you are correct. Just for fun, here's a list of significant rules changes, according to FIFA.

    1869 - Goal kicks introduced
    1872 - Corner kicks introduced
    1891 - Penalty kicks introduced (taken from a 12 yard line)
    1891 - Three referees used instead of 2
    1891 - Official now on the field (instead of making calls from the side)
    1891 - Goal net accepted into the laws
    1902 - 18 yard penalty area and penalty spot introduced
    1912 - Goalkeepers can no longer handle the ball outside of the penalty area
    1920 - No offsides on throw-ins
    1925 - Offsides rule changes from 3 defending players to 2
    1990 - Benefit of the doubt switch from defender to attacker in case of offides
    1992 - Goalkeeper cannot use his hands when receiving a backpass from his own team (this caused a lot of controversy from the purists)
    1998 - Fierce tackles from behind are now an automatic red card

    The game's changed quite a bit over the years, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  24. 1.many in FIFA remember the 1960's and 1970's when it was all out war on the pitch. The game is trying to stay away from that so they will not start penalizing flops because what happens when they are not flops.
    soccer has no intention of becoming the gridiron

    2.what is the point of referees then. Players coaches and fans have to live with referees decision while on the pitch. Plain and simple, some times it goes your way and sometimes it doesnt.
    most only complain when the referee goes against them

    3.
    FIFA manages the sport of soccer, which is the only global professional sport on the planet.
    technology cost money and most of the world is full of people looking to buy the food they help grow.

    4.
    soccer doesnt want to become the gridiron

    5.
    overcomplicating penalty kicks only adds to more problems because fans players and coaches will argue the wrong penalty kick style was given. Keep it to one and referees decision

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/8230623/japan_vs_the_states_wwc_final.html

    ReplyDelete
  25. lol???.. dood stick with football lol

    ReplyDelete
  26. Challenge flags in soccer!!! Ug.

    Why is there diving in soccer? A big part of it is that it one of the ways players protect themselves from serious injury. Yes, as much as a replay will make it seem otherwise, diving is a skill. If you are convinced in real time that a foul was committed, it was a good play. Most of the time there is a foul anyway. There is a misunderstanding about what constitutes a foul, if a player makes a dangerous challenge from an awkward position, weather contact is made or not, it is a foul. A good diver will discourage the opposition from making a dangerous challenge, or when one is made, anticipating the contact, whether its it made or not, helps the player avoid serious injury. Appreciating how and why diving is part of the game, and acknowledging a skillful dive, will help you to better appreciate the game.

    That said, I find rolling around on the ground dramatically only to be up and running two seconds later, pointless, ridiculous, and off-puting. That said, I'm not sure what you can do about it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Dude don't write an article on things you know nothing about. You're getting torched in your comments. The only thing I agree with is the post match reviewing of the games to see if someone deserves further punnishment. I can't even believe someone actually wrote in an article they thought would be good that throwing a red flag onto the field to challenge a call. lol wow.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm really surprised that so many people are defending the flopping and the "human element" in soccer. Would you really feel the same way if a World Cup final was decided against your team on the basis of one of these idiosynchrasies of the sport? What if it happened to your team again, four years later?

    ReplyDelete
  29. All good suggestions, except for the challenge flag.

    Floppers/drivers should be shot.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Oops-- leave the drivers alone.

    That's divers who should be shot.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I find it funny how the people who disagree are so adamant about being right. These comments seem to be split down the middle. Some of you hate these suggestions, some of you think they are great, and some are split on the suggestions. Still, funny how the people are agree are so much more rational and understanding whereas the people who disagree think everyone agrees with them.
    Also, and i don't know how many times I have to say this, I'm very aware that some of these suggestions are more far fetched. However, that's the fun in writing an article, suggesting things that are far fetched. ALso, sports always change, and at first the changes aren't popular, but in time the changes become part of the game.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I have enjoyed watching and playing soccer/futbol for many years. This years WWC shows that changes need to be made to ensure a fair outcome. I agree with many of your suggestions. One that I think is important is to add an additional referee on the field. The players, and the pace of the game is just too fast for one person, male or female, to keep pace. Splitting the field responsibilities between two referees may also solve some of the other problems that have been mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  33. fifa has no reason to make these changes, as long as the game stays as popular as it is. bcs was just as bad as fifa, but refused to change until the ratings started slipping. until the fifa geezers retire and some new, younger members emerge, I doubt we'll see much change at all. No goal line review, even after that England/Germany fiasco.

    I'd personally like to see some radical changes. I absolutely despise diving, so I'm all for post match reds for diving and delaying, but I also can't stand all the stupid rules in place that limit the offense.

    Make all handballs a foul, no exceptions. Refs are too arbitrary calling handballs, with too many blatant handballs not called.

    Throw in rule is totally useless, why restrict players from throwing it in any way they want? I'd actually like to see the throw in removed, and convert them to kicks instead. Kicking the ball out of bounds would become very undesirable on defense, and it'd create a lot more set play opportunities.

    Not allowing goalkeepers to pick up the ball would make the game flow better, and it'd change goalkeeping tactics and give some advantage to the offense as well.

    limit of 3 substitutions...??? Another stupid restriction. With less restrictions on substitutions, it'd allow teams to constantly bring in fresh legs, and keep up a fast pace.

    Does anyone see any need for the offside calls?

    ReplyDelete